St. Clair Shores, Michigan — A suburban Detroit couple is facing serious criminal charges after prosecutors alleged they used an explosive device marked “BYE BYE” in an incident involving their 72-year-old neighbor.
The case has prompted additional scrutiny after investigators reportedly discovered firearms, ammunition and materials that could be used to assemble explosive devices inside the couple’s home.
Couple Accused of Throwing Explosive Device
According to the Macomb County Prosecutor’s Office, Jason Showers, 45, and Megan Showers, 38, are accused of taking part in the incident Monday at their St. Clair Shores neighborhood.
Prosecutors allege that Megan Showers ignited a red, cylindrical explosive device before Jason allegedly threw it into the yard of their elderly neighbor.
The device reportedly carried the alarming words “BYE BYE” on its exterior.
Authorities have not disclosed whether the device caused injuries or significant property damage. However, prosecutors described the allegations as particularly concerning because the alleged target was an older member of the community.
Police Search Uncovers Weapons and Materials
Following the incident, investigators searched the Showers’ residence.
According to prosecutors, law enforcement officers discovered firearms, ammunition and materials for assembling explosive devices during the search.
Macomb County Prosecutor Peter Lucido said the allegations were serious because they involved an individual who was particularly vulnerable.
His office said it would continue pursuing the case while emphasizing the importance of protecting public safety. The discovery of weapons and other materials has also resulted in additional charges against Jason Showers.
Texas Cop Accused of Killing 3 During Custody Fight, Then Fleeing Mexico With His 3-Year-Old Son
Jason Showers Faces Multiple Felony Charges
Jason Showers has been charged with being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm and being a prohibited person in possession of ammunition. Each of those charges can carry a maximum sentence of five years in prison.
Prosecutors also charged him with two counts of felony firearm possession.
Each felony firearm count carries a mandatory two-year sentence, which would have to be served consecutively to the sentence for the underlying felony if he is convicted.
The charges could become even more serious because prosecutors say Jason Showers is a habitual offender with at least four previous felony convictions.
If convicted of any of the four top charges, prosecutors said, the judge could have the authority to impose a life sentence.
Couple Appears in Court as Bonds Are Set
Jason and Megan Showers made their first court appearance Wednesday. A probable cause hearing is scheduled for August 14, when prosecutors are expected to present additional information supporting the charges.
The judge set Jason Showers’ bond at $100,000 cash-only. Court records show that he remained in the Macomb County Jail after the hearing.
If he is released, he will be required to wear a GPS steel-cuff tether. He would also be prohibited from returning to the marital home and from contacting either his wife or the alleged victim.
Megan Showers received a $20,000 bond, with the option to post 10% through a bail bondsman.
Unlike her husband, the judge permitted Megan to return to the couple’s home. However, she was ordered to have no contact with Jason Showers or their neighbor.
Prosecutors Emphasize Public Safety Concerns
The allegations have raised serious concerns within the community because of the alleged use of an explosive device near an elderly resident.
Authorities have not publicly established a motive for the alleged incident, and the defendants have not been convicted of the charges. The case will now proceed through the court system as prosecutors and defense attorneys address the allegations and evidence.
If convicted, the couple could face substantial prison sentences, with Jason Showers potentially facing life imprisonment because of his alleged prior felony record.
What do you think about the charges in this case? Should people with serious criminal records face tougher restrictions on possessing weapons? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
